Understand the “Build” in Design-Build under SPP 207. Learn how architects can legally manage construction while upholding RA 9266 compliance.
This article is Part 1 of a 3‑Part Series on Design-Build by Administration. Part 2 continues with Best Practices for Structuring Design-Build by Administration, and Part 3 concludes with Project Success by Administration: Delivering Certainty From Start to Finish.
In our previous article, we clarified how R.A. 4566 (Contractors’ License Law) distinguishes Licensed Professional Practice from Contracting. The next natural question is: How does this apply to the “Build” in Design-Build services under SPP 207?
The 2010 Standards of Professional Practice (SPP), adopted as part of the IRR of R.A. 9266 (Architecture Act of 2004), provides the formal basis for architects to undertake Design-Build Services (DBS)—while maintaining their professional identity and compliance with the law.
SPP 207 recognizes that in many projects, the optimal balance of time, cost, and quality can be achieved when the same professional who designed the project also manages its construction. This is because:
This arrangement is not a shortcut around professional ethics or legal boundaries—it is a structured, accountable project delivery method.
Here, the architect provides Regular Design Services (SPP 202) plus full construction phase services that go beyond periodic site visits:
All expenditures are paid directly by the owner; the architect’s role is as administrator, not contractor.
In this mode, the architect still acts under professional capacity, but commits to a guaranteed ceiling on construction cost.
This approach aligns well with transparency, risk allocation, and owner protection—concepts we’ve also applied in Build by Administration with Guaranteed Maximum Cost.
SPP 207 is clear: regardless of the delivery method, the architect must:
This preserves the integrity of the architectural profession while ensuring clients receive both competent design and accountable project implementation.
Design-Build under SPP 207 is not a loophole for architects to “act like contractors.” It is a professional pathway recognized in law, structured to:
Architects who engage in Design-Build without understanding SPP 207 risk crossing into prohibited contracting territory. Those who follow the standard, however, elevate both their practice and their value to clients.
Design-Build, SPP 207, RA 9266, Architecture Act Philippines, Architect Design Build Services, Guaranteed Maximum Project Construction Cost, GMPCC, Design Build by Administration, Licensed Professional Practice, Architect Construction Services, RA 4566 compliance, Architect Build Services Philippines